$1 Million Giveaway Logo Design
Wollen Sie auch einen Job wie diesen gewinnen?
Dieser Kunde bekam 48 Logo-Designs von 17 Designern. Dabei wurde dieses Logo-Design Design von MemoCo als Gewinner ausgewählt.
Kostenlos anmelden Design Jobs finden- Garantiert
Logo-Design Kurzbeschreibung
We are running a new promotion this year called the
"MotionLoops.com Million Dollar Giveaway"
and we need a logo designed for this that matches our website colors, style and image.
Our logo is attached please do NOT incorporate it in your design - it's just for reference and so you can grab the colors or letter forms if you want to use them. Since this logo may sit side by side with your "million dollar logo" it would be redundant to include it in your design.
Aktualisierungen
Project Deadline Extended
Reason: Somehow the original contest was set to be open for only a few days by accident.
Added Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Zielmarkt/( -märkte)
Video Editing Industry
Logo Text
MotionLoops.com $1 Million Giveaway OR MotionLoops.com Million Dollar Giveaway
Logo Stile, die Sie interessieren können
Emblem-Logo
Logo eingeschlossen in einer Form
Pictorial / Combination-Logo
Ein reales Objekt (Text optional)
Sehen und fühlen
Jeder Schieber zeichnet eine der Charakteristiken der Marke des Kunden aus sowie den Stil, den euer Logo widerspiegeln sollte.
Elegant
Fett
Spielerisch
Ernst
Traditionel
Modern
Sympatisch
Professionell
Feminin
Männlich
Bunt
Konservativ
Wirtschaftlich
Gehobenes
Anforderungen
Muss haben
- Bling - We envisions a "rich" looking logo for this one.
Pizazz - Some good examples might be found as lottery ticket titles.
Schön zu haben
- See our website www.motionloops.com for complementing colors and existing company image.
Sollte nicht haben
- Should not have pics of money, coins or any other form of currency. The US dollar sign is ok however.
Please do not submit something with just text. We are looking for a logo - not a font.
Please do not use our logo as-is inside your design. It will too often sit side-by-side with your logo so that would be redundant.