Feedback please on my designs, thank you

Kindly feedback my entry #36937018.
Thank You.

feedback me on design #36937070 , regards

plz chq #36939445

Hello, Project Owner!
I have sent you my design with the Design Id #36940614. Please provide feedback and request changes if necessary.
Thank you.

Thank you for your message. I changed the direction because I'm not liking anything I see: I want a simple, iconic symbol for Battleworn Legacy that communicates earned strength, resilience, and legacy—not a full logo with letters. Think of a “worn shield” mark: a clean shield silhouette with three intentional battle notches/slashes that subtly imply the brand (you can suggest a hidden “W” shape through negative space), but no BL text. The symbol must work as a one-color mark first (black or off-white), be high-contrast, and stay readable at small sizes for hat embroidery, patches, and social avatars. Keep it minimal, bold, and premium—no gradients, no tiny details—just a strong shape that feels forged and battle-tested.

Thank you for your message. I changed the direction because I'm not liking anything I see: I want a simple, iconic symbol for Battleworn Legacy that communicates earned strength, resilience, and legacy—not a full logo with letters. Think of a “worn shield” mark: a clean shield silhouette with three intentional battle notches/slashes that subtly imply the brand (you can suggest a hidden “W” shape through negative space), but no BL text. The symbol must work as a one-color mark first (black or off-white), be high-contrast, and stay readable at small sizes for hat embroidery, patches, and social avatars. Keep it minimal, bold, and premium—no gradients, no tiny details—just a strong shape that feels forged and battle-tested.

Thank you for your message. I changed the direction because I'm not liking anything I see: I want a simple, iconic symbol for Battleworn Legacy that communicates earned strength, resilience, and legacy—not a full logo with letters. Think of a “worn shield” mark: a clean shield silhouette with three intentional battle notches/slashes that subtly imply the brand (you can suggest a hidden “W” shape through negative space), but no BL text. The symbol must work as a one-color mark first (black or off-white), be high-contrast, and stay readable at small sizes for hat embroidery, patches, and social avatars. Keep it minimal, bold, and premium—no gradients, no tiny details—just a strong shape that feels forged and battle-tested.

Thank you for your message. I changed the direction because I'm not liking anything I see: I want a simple, iconic symbol for Battleworn Legacy that communicates earned strength, resilience, and legacy—not a full logo with letters. Think of a “worn shield” mark: a clean shield silhouette with three intentional battle notches/slashes that subtly imply the brand (you can suggest a hidden “W” shape through negative space), but no BL text. The symbol must work as a one-color mark first (black or off-white), be high-contrast, and stay readable at small sizes for hat embroidery, patches, and social avatars. Keep it minimal, bold, and premium—no gradients, no tiny details—just a strong shape that feels forged and battle-tested.

Thank you for your message. I changed the direction because I'm not liking anything I see: I want a simple, iconic symbol for Battleworn Legacy that communicates earned strength, resilience, and legacy—not a full logo with letters. Think of a “worn shield” mark: a clean shield silhouette with three intentional battle notches/slashes that subtly imply the brand (you can suggest a hidden “W” shape through negative space), but no BL text. The symbol must work as a one-color mark first (black or off-white), be high-contrast, and stay readable at small sizes for hat embroidery, patches, and social avatars. Keep it minimal, bold, and premium—no gradients, no tiny details—just a strong shape that feels forged and battle-tested.